The Project Francesco Forti, INFN and University, Pisa Commissione Scientifica Nazionale 1 29 Giugno 2009 Status update

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status2 Update da marzo in pillole 24/4 - “Mini” Machine Advisory Committee 29/5 – Approvazione Direttivo INFN struttura progetto speciale 18/6 - Presentazione al CERN Council e approvazione dello strategy group per la Preparatory Phase Probabile cambiamento di sito Tor Vergata  LNF. Intensa attività per l’ottimizzazione della macchina Ottimizzazione del rivelatore in corso: Detector Geometry Working Group; Detector R&D and engineering 14-17/4 Warwick Physics Workshop – /6 Perugia General Workshop –

Perugia June 15,2009Marcello A. Giorgi3 Accelerator R&D, Engineering and Construction Accelerator Technical Board Detector R&D, Engineering and Construction Detector Technical Board Site computing system, offline Infrastructure, Facilities, Services Oversight Board International Board of Representatives R&D + Preparatory Studies Linac Magnets Mech. Design IR/Final Focus Vacuum Transfer Lines Alignment Diagnostics Polarization Parameters Optics Beam Dynamics RF/Feedback Fluid Supplies Damping Rings Control System Power Supplies Rad. Protection Tunnel, power, water, utilities, ……… Computing (M.Morandin) Accelerator Consortium (J.Seeman ) Detector Collaboration (F.Forti B.Ratcliff) Local Infrastructure (S.Tomassini SVT DCH PID EMC IFR Magnet Offline Computing Online Computing Electronics Trigger DAQ Rad. Monitor Lum. Monitor MDI Computing Model Machine advisory committee DET-Adv. Committee COMP-Adv Committee SuperB Organization Chart for TDR Phase Director (M.Giorgi) DeputyDirector (D.Hitlin) DeputyDirector (D.Leith) DeputyDirector (G.Wormser ) Project Board Project Office Perugia June 15,20093Marcello A. Giorgi

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status4 Piano di lavoro 2009 –Ci si aspetta un segnale chiaro di approvazione da parte del governo. –Presentato la scorsa settimana al CIPE Fine 2009 –Preparazione di un “Intermediate Technical Report”, non troppo dettagliato Dimensionamento ingegneria civile Reclutamento nuovi collaboratori Funding di agenzie straniere Fine 2010 –Preparazione del Technical Design Report Dettaglio del progetto di acceleratore e rivelatore

Acceleratore

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status6 PARAMETERS

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status7 Mini Mac report – Apr 24 Committee: Klaus Balewski (DESY), John Corlett (LBNL), Jonathan Dorfan (SLAC, Chair), Stuart Henderson (ORNL), Tom Himel (SLAC), Claudio Pellegrini (UCLA), Daniel Schulte (CERN), Ferdi Willeke (BNL), Andy Wolski (Liverpool), Frank Zimmermann (CERN) “The MAC now feels secure in enthusiastically encouraging the SuperB design team to proceed to the TDR phase, with confidence that the design parameters are achievable.” Recent strong progress: –Crab waist tests at DAFNE –Beam-beam measurements (DAFNE) and simulations –IR design –Lattice –Polarization spin rotators “Nonetheless, much detailed work remains to bring the design to the level where (a) ground-breaking, (b) final engineering of accelerator components can commence.” Further needed work areas: –Emittance tuning and evaluate tolerances –Dynamic aperture calculations –IR and arc vacuum systems –Injection system –Vibration studies –Polarization lattice.

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status8 SITES : Tor Vergata…….. SuperB rings

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status9 LNF option

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status10 The Interaction Region Design

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status11 June 16-19, 2009Perugia MeetingPage 11 SC Quadrupoles at the IP (E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni)

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status12 Detector Layout – Reuse parts of Babar BASELINE OPTION

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status13 Detector Proto-Techboard Detector Coordinators – B.Ratcliff, F. Forti Technical Coordinator – W.Wisnieswki SVT – G. Rizzo DCH – G. Finocchiaro PID – N.Arnaud, J.Va’vra EMC – D.Hitlin  F.Porter, C.Cecchi IFR – R.Calabrese Magnet – W.Wisniewski Electronics, Trigger, DAQ – D. Breton, U. Marconi Online/DAQ – Offline SW – –Simulation coordinator – D.Brown –Fast simulation – M. Rama –Full Simulation – F. Bianchi Rad monitor – Lumi monitor – Background simulation – M.Boscolo, E.Paoloni Machine Detector Interface – Structure inside subsystem being setup Some engineers identified

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status14 Detector R&D plan for the TDR Main parts of Babar to reuse –Quartz bars of the DIRC –Barrel EMC CsI(Tl) crystal and mechanical structure –Superconducting coil and flux return yoke. SysR&DEngineering SVTLayer 0 thin pixels Low mass mechanical support Silicon strip layers Readout architecture DCHHigh speed waveform digitizingCF mechanical structure Gas speed, cell size Barrel PID Photon detection for quartz barsStandoff box replacement Forw PIDTime of flight option Focusing RICH option Mechanical integration. Electronics EMCLYSO characterization Light detection Readout electronics Forward EMC mechanical support IFRFiber disposition in scintillatorLocation of photo-detectors ETDHigh speed data link Radiation hard devices Trigger strategy Bhabha rejection

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status15 Novità sul detector SVT - conferma accelerazione su pixel ibridi per Layer 0 DCH - finanziamento gruppi canadesi PID - Nuove possibili soluzioni PID in avanti EMC - (Presentazione estesa per sblocco cristalli ed elettronica) IFR - Risultati su non utilizzabilità fibre chiare e schermatura SiPM. ETD - Nuovo documento architetturale COMP - Utilizzo di Fastsim e Bruno e organizzazione produzioni

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status16 Silicon Vertex Tracker The Babar SVT technology is adequate for R > 3cm: –use design similar to Babar SVT Layer0 is subject to large backround and needs to be extremely thin: –More than 5MHz/cm 2, 1MRad/yr, < 0.5%X 0 –Striplets option: mature technology, not so robust against background. Marginal with background rate higher than ~ 5 MHz/cm 2 Moderate R&D needed on module interconnection/mechanics/FE chip (FSSR2) –CMOS MAPS option new & challenging technology: can provide the required thickness existing devices are too slow Extensive R&D ongoing on 3-well devices 50x50um 2 –Hybrid Pixel Option: tends to be too thick. An example: Alice hybrid pixel module ~ 1% X 0 Possible material reduction with the latest technology improvements Viable option, although marginal PRESHAPERDISCLATCH

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status17 Attivita’ finalizzate alla stesura del TDR a fine 2010 R&D sulle opzioni per Layer 0: –Pixel ibridi: riduzione del pitch e del materiale supporto/cooling per target Layer0-SuperB (tutte le sezioni coinvolte) –CMOS MAPS per dimostrazione fattibilita’ di modulo a pixel multichip con specifiche SuperB (tutte le sezioni coinvolte) –Continuazione attivita’ Striplets/FSSR2 (TS) (backup for Layer0) –Attivita’ su pixel ad integrazione verticale in VIPIX (CSN5) Layer 1-5 a strip : –Design componenti moduli: sensori+fanout (TS), valutazione chip lettura (TS+PV ), “ibrido intelligente” (TS+MI) Meccanica: –Design beam-pipe + Light support and cooling for Layer0 modules (PI), –Module design for the external Layers + Support frame & support cones (TO-MI) –Important interplay with IR design to have the Layer0 easily accessible for replacement. (with SLAC) Off Detector electronics (MI) and DAQ Development (BO) Attivita’ 2009 SVT Sezioni: Bologna, Milano, Pavia, Pisa, Roma III, Torino, Trieste Baseline Marzo 2009 Continue R&D

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status18 Spese (2009) Layer 0 - TDR Assegnati CSN (kE) Fondi Prin (kE) Spese Aggiuntive (kE) Integrazione costi matrice MAPS40 MAPS: test structures 22kE + contrib. 80 kE matrice MAPS 60 mm2 (Jan 2010)102 Carriers + Testboard APSEL5D5 Pixel module comp. (Al bus+HDI)20 Meccanica moduli Layer 024 Front-End chip pixel ibridi (ST-25 mm2) 40 Carriers + Testboard Hybrid Pixel 5 Sensori a pixel (ITC-IRST) 15 Sviluppi meccanica Layer 0+Beam Pipe 41 TOTALE Spese R&D per Layer A Marzo presentato in CSN1 un piano spese complessivo per il 2009 considerando la nuova strategia dovuta all’accelerazione del progetto: (Pixel ibridi+MAPS)  proposta: cofinanziamento attivita’ complessiva Layer0 tra fondi CSN1 - Regione Lazio - PRIN2007/Giorgi: –Attivita’ MAPS + pixel module components finanziata in CSN1: 150 kE –Fondi PRIN2007 per integrazione costi matrice MAPS: 40 kE –Fondi Regione Lazio per finanaziamento sulle attivita’ aggiuntive: 100 kE pixel ibridi, probabile baseline per Layer0 nel TDR ulteriori sviluppi di meccanica per il Layer0 e design beam-pipe, dovute all’accelerazione del progetto. Fondi Regione Lazio Assegn CSN1 Prin 2007/Giorgi Marzo 2009

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status19 Dopo incontro Marzo 2009 in CSN1 Giudicato ragionevole il nuovo piano di R&D proposto per TDR Layer0 con cofinanziamento CSN1(150kE) -Prin (40 kE) - Regione Lazio (100kE ancora acquisire) –Lavoriamo con questa ipotesi Parte dell’assegnazione di CSN per Layer0, destinata in origine all’attivita’ MAPS-Pisa (85kE), che e’ rimandata all’inizio del 2010, viene utilizzata per pixel ibridi e su meccanica per Layer0 (60+22kE). Il resto dell’assegnazione del 2009 nelle varie sedi viene usata sugli items Layer0 effettivamente finanziati. Inseriamo nei preventivi INFN 2010: –items Layer0 previsti essere coperti da cofinanziamento Regione Lazio –nuovi items per altre attivita’ Layer0 –altre attivita’ SVT non legate ad R&D per Layer0.

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status20 Utilizzo assegnazione 2009 MAPS-Pisa L’assegnazione a Pisa 80+5 kE per MAPS chip+testboard (rimandata all’inizio del 2010) verra’ invece utilizzata nel 2009 per pixel ibridi e meccanica per Layer0: –Chip FE pixel ibridi (32x128 pixels, ST130nm) Sett. 2009: 40 kE –Produzione sensori per pixel ibridi FBK-IRST Sett. 2009: 15 kE –Chip carriers +Testboard pixel ibridi per lab test: 5 kE –Materiale e lavorazioni ulteriori prototipi mecc: 22 kE Evoluzione supporti moduli a microcanali Layer 0 con ulteriore riduzione materiale: da 0.3% a 0.2% X0 (15 kE) Opzioni supporto pixel ibridi per layer0+layer1 (3 kE) End-flange Layer0 (4 kE)

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status21 Lighter structure, all in Carbon Fiber (CF) –Preliminary studies show that dome-shaped CF end-plates with X0~2% seem achievable (compare 13-26% in BaBar DCH) Design faster&lighter electronics (taking into account detectors options to be possibly installed behind backward end-plates) To control expected increase in occupancy: –studying faster gas mixtures –considering smaller cells –alternative solutions being explored tapered shape of end-plates Build on B A B AR drift chamber concept: no major R&D effort needed, but: The drift chamber LNF Canada: Carleton, McGill, UVic, UBC, TRIUMF

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status22 DCH –ongoing work Studies on system design Fast simulation studies on subsystems boundaries for design optimization – LNF Detailed simulation of gas mixtures and cell geometry with Magboltz/Garfield/Heed – Carleton Comparison and Preliminary overall design for drift chamber (e.g. endplate considerations, square vs. hexagonal cells, all-stereo, etc) – TRIUMF/UBC Laboratory work at LNF Gas infrastructure completely redone External tracker recomissioned Test tubes inserted and working –First cosmic ray data collected (80%He-20%isob.) –Analysis ongoing Laboratory work at UVic experimental validation of Magboltz/Garfield/Heed description of candidate gas properties (gain, drift velocity, diffusion, clustering) Gruppi canadesi finanziati per il 2009/2010

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status23 Particle Identification Hadronic PID system essential for P( ,K)>0.7GeV/c (use dE/dx for p<0.7GeV/c) Baseline is to reuse BaBar DIRC barrel-only design –Excellent performance to 4GeV/c –Robust operation –Elegant mechanical support –Photon detectors outside field region –Radiation hard fused silica radiators Photon detector replacement –Baseline: Use pixelated fast PMTs with a smaller SOB to improve background performance by x with identical PID performance

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status24 Forw/Back PID option Extending PID coverage to the forward and backward regions has been considered Possibly useful, although the physics case needs to be established quantitatively Serious interference with other systems –Material in front of the EMC –Needs space cause displacement of front face of EMC Technologies Aerogel-based focusing RICH –Working device –Requires significant space (15 cm) and thickness (about 28%X0) Time of flight –Need about 10ps resolution to be competitive with focusing RICH –15-20ps already achieved. Can 10ps be achieved ?

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status25 The electromagnetic calorimeter *Barrel *BaBar barrel crystals not suffering signs of radiation damage. They’re sufficiently fast and radiation hard for SuperB needs  They can be reused. (Would have been) most expensive detector component *Background dominated by radiative Bhabhas. IR shielding design is crucial *Endcaps *Best possible hermiticity important for key physics measurements *New forward endcap *backward endcap is an option BaBar Barrel 5760 CsI(Tl) Crystals Essential detector to measure energy and direction of g and e, discriminate between e and p, and detect neutral hadrons

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status26 Forward and backward EMC *Forward endcap –BaBar CsI(Tl) endcap inadequate for higher rates and radiation dose of SuperB Need finer granularity Faster crystals and readout electronics comparable total X0 –Option 1: LYSO crystals frees 10cm for a forw. PID system radiation hard, fast, small Moliere radius, good light yield expensive (~40$/cc) at the moment –Option 2: retain 3 outer rings of CsI(Tl), LYSO the others less expensive no space for forw. PID system *Backward endcap (option) –Pb plates and scintillating tiles with fiber readout to SiPMs

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status27 Beam tests Giugno alla BTF –Test di lettura APD/PIN Diode di un singolo cristallo Novembre  Febbraio alla BTF –Test di un modulo completo –Cristalli, fotorivelatori, elettronica, meccanica –Essenziale per scrivere il TDR

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status28 Cristalli per TB -8 cristalli ordinati da INFN a St. Gobain in produzione - 4 cristalli da ordinare a St. Gobain da INFN - 13 cristalli da ordinare in Cina (SIPAT) da Caltech -fondi OK -Possibilità di un nuovo fornitore cinese per i cristalli LYSO: SICCAS -Utilità della concorrenza per abbassare i prezzi e garantire la produzione -Necessità di qualificare i cristalli e di aiutare la ditta a raggiungere lo standard qualitativo -Acquisto di un kit per la misura del light output da prestare a lungo termine alla ditta

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status29 Costi Cristalli 4870 euro + IVA = 5844 euro/cristallo 4 cristalli euro 3 (1 tool per ogni tipo di cristallo) tooling per il polishing delle facce 850 euro/pezzo = 2550 euro TOTALE euro 26Keuro Kit misura del light output Ortec Costo 5k€

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status30 Novità per elettronica Roma e Perugia hanno studiato una possibile proposta per l’elettronica per il TB (primo passo verso TDR nel 2010) per leggere APD e PD contemporaneamente da ogni cristallo. GOAL: 50 canali di lettura per Novembre (25 LYSO + anello esterno di CsI (CLEO))

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status31 The EMC Forward read out options 2 x APD (5x5mm) 2 x PIN (10x10mm) 1 x PIN ( 20x10mm ) CSP + shaper (Number CsI(TI) Forward endcap babar *4) Number of Lyso crystals =3600 TIA or TA We start to test Charge sensitive preamp at Beam Test Facility in Frascati Valerio Bocci SuperB Perugia 2009 Primo test fatto a Giungo su un singolo cristallo a BTF

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status32 1 LYSO crystal (2x2x20cm3) with two different readout 1 PiN photodiode S (1x2cm2) read by CREMAT CSP CR110 (gain 1.4V/pC) + CREMAT shaper CR200, 250ns shaping time 2 APD S (0.5x0.5cm2) read by CREMAT CSP CR110 (gain 0.15V/pC) + CREMAT shaper CR200, 250ns shaping time TB

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status33 1 e- and 2e- peaks are well separated

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status34 Elettronica per TB Richiesta a Marzo di 14.5 Keuro CR112 55$ x 4 = 220$ CR FWHM Shaper 230nS = 55$ x 4 = 220$ PGA Amplifier AD8369 x1 x32 5$ x 4 = 20$ ADC AD $ x 4 = 200$ DS1820 Dallas DigThermo = 10$ x 4 = 40$ ADC_Clock_LVDS CDCE421E = 10$ x 4 = 40$ EMCO C05-R HV_Programmable_Bias 1 x 4 = 250$ Totale x 4 CH Analog + Digital ADC = circa 1000$ N°4 Opal_Kelly Bords = 300$ x 4 = 1200$ (per tutti i 48CH) Totale 13.2 k$ + schermatura 3 Keuro + circuiti stampati 8 Keuro TOTALE 18 Keuro

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status35

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status36 Fotorivelatori 50 PiN S x1.0 cm € per 50 PIN TOTALE 5.0 K€ IVA inclusa

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status37 Provides discrimination between  and  ±. Help detection and direction measurement of K L (together with EMC) Composed by 1 hexagonal barrel + 2 endcaps as in BaBar Add absorber w.r.t. BaBar to improve  /  separation. Amount and distribution to be optimized –7-8 absorber layers –reuse of BaBar IFR iron under evaluation Use extruded scintillator a la MINOS coupled to geiger mode APDs through WLS fibers –expected hit rates of O(100) Hz/cm 2 d –single layer (barrel) with other coordinate through time (1ns) –or double coord. layout (endcap) The Instrumented Flux Return

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status38 Strategia per prototipo IFR A MARZO 2009: Necessità di poter operare anche in un ambiente ‘ostile’ come flusso di neutroni Utilizzo di fibre chiare per allontanarsi dalla zona ‘calda’ Aumento numero di fibre scintillanti per recuperare la luce persa Aumento dimensione del fotorivelatore per leggere tutte le fibre di una slab di scintillatore TEST EFFETTUATI: Test sui SiPM confermano il danno da radiazione a 10 9 n/cm 2 Aumento delle fibre scintillanti porta solo miglioramenti marginali Necessità schermaggio locale dei fotorivelatori 38

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status39 1 vs 2 vs 3 kuraray fibers at the close end (CLOSE end: ~0.3m from scintillator) 1 fiber 2 fibers 3 fibers R2/1 = 1.46 R3/1 = 1.65 With 3 fibers we gain only 13% more signal wrt 2 fiber case ADC ch

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status40 If preliminary results will be confirmed SiPM can be damaged with a dose of 10 9 n/cm 2 Need for accelerator background simulations + study on neutron shielding

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status41 ETD architecture proposal

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status42 ETD Status Main issue is the high speed links: –Difficult to get fixed link latency and jitter –There already is a solution for a fully FPGA-based link => OK for the off- detector links –Jitter measurements are at the level of 20ps rms. –R&D work has to start on the detector side to find a solution for the radiation area Alberto Aloisio (INFN Napoli) has been given the charge of managing these activities. Readout module –Based on the experience from AGATA experiment, a tentative proposal for the design of the ROM exists –Padova and Bologna are interested in this design. ECS link to the detector – The SPECS bus, designed for LHCb, has been presented. –Interest in LAL –LAL could also take care of the FTCS system. Activities linked to L1 trigger are still uncovered.

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status43 Detector decisions Major “Global Geometry” decisions –(Change design of flux return ?) –Forward PID: if and what technology ? –Backward EMC Less major “Geometry” decisions –SVT Layer 0 radius and internal geometry –DCH shape –Transition radius between SVT and DCH –PID readout technology (and size) –Forward EMC geometry –IFR absorber distribution Guidance from physics Detector Geometry Working Group setup –Chaired by Matteo Rama (LNF) and Achille Stocchi (LAL)

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status44 Computing FastSim: used for physics studies

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status45 FullSim (Bruno) Geant4 simulation with full detector geometry EMC Barrel-endcap transition region

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status46 Computing production SuperB software is grid enabled –Necessary Babar packages have been extracted and made independent of Babar environment Created superbvo.org, distributed in INFNGRID All sites can enable this VO –At CNAF the setup is complete Started collaboration with LHC groups to benefit from their experience web.infn.it/esc09

People

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status48 WBS for TDR Developed Work Breakdown Structure for TDR preparation

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status49 Developed a hiring plan Most urgent positions to be filled identified –Although more will be needed as plan develops Funding through region Lazio TDR funds and/or co- funding from other agencies Total of 19 positions (phys+engineers) –Different priorities being assessed

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status50 Approval and funding INFN has a good relations with Regional Lazio Government and the Italian National government. The President of INFN is confident that a clear answer about approval of SuperB and will come before the end of this year. Meanwhile, as announced in Orsay, INFN intends to start MOU’s with labs and agencies to officially support the project and the TDR phase.

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status51 Physics activity Strong connection between theorists and experimentalists CERN Workshop: Flavour in the Era of the LHC SuperB specific workshops Perugia June 15,200951Marcello A. Giorgi Workshop on New Physics with SuperB 14th-17th April 2009

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status52 Requirements to the physics goal L peak ≥10 36 cm -2 s -1 ( asymmetric GeV E cm = m Y(4s) ) –Rich b charm tau physics program 85% Polarization di e - (7.0GeV) for  : –Asymmetry from T and CP Violation –BKG reduction in LFV, distinguish among LFV models. –Forw-Back asymmetry contribution for  g-2. Option to run SuperB still with a luminosity of cm -2 s -1 at charm threshold (4.0 GeV ) –Pure DD bar, no additional fragmentation. –High signal/bkg : optimal for channels with –Quantum Coherence: unique opportunity to measure D 0 - D 0 bar relative phase. –~10 9 DD /month at cm -2 s -1 –Time dependent measurements at 4 GeV as for B sector at Y(4s) in BABAR and Belle. It will only be possible at SuperB.

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status53 Summary of Physics Goals Increase by O(10) the precision of BaBar &Belle (*) Challenge CKM at the level of 1% (*)  LFV sensitivity improvement by a factor between 10 and 100. Explore T-violation in . Search for magnetic structure of . Explore CPV in Charm. Great new Spectroscopy exploration. It can be achieved with 75 ab -1 in 5 years at Y(4s) and a few months at Charm threshold with peak lumi of cm 2 s -1.

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status54 A.Masiero: “Flavor and New Physics: Frustration and Hope”

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status55

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status56 BACKUP

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status57 Richieste 2009 Necessità urgenti: –Costruzione modulo EMC per Beam Test (Vedi presentazione di Cecchi): 49k€ + 5K€ –Rabbocco missioni interne (già discusse a marzo): 37 k€ –Meno 6K€ delle missioni per la BTF che vanno al 2010 –Totale: 85 k€ I SJ disponibili sono: –Consumi 59k€ su SuperB Perugia –Consumi 25k€ su Babar Ferrara, non serviranno, mentre servirà tutto il SJ di M.E. su Babar, per il quale chiederemo lo sblocco a settembre –Totale: 84k€ Si richiede quindi una assegnazione aggiuntiva di 1k€

30 giugno 2009F.Forti - SuperB Status58 Super KEKB