A randomized study on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: Study design and preliminary results: The Everest Trial Piergiorgio Cao, MD, Giuseppe Giordano, MD, Paola De Rango, MD, Simona Zannetti, MD, Roberto Chiesa, MD, Gioacchino Coppi, MD, Domenico Palombo, MD, Carlo Spartera, MD, Vincenzo Stancanelli, MD, Enrico Vecchiati, MD, Collaborators of the EVEREST Study Group Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 595-605 (April 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70223-X Copyright © 1998 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Trial profile at 30-day follow-up. *Withdrawn from assigned treatment but in follow-up for the intention-to-treat analysis. **Two patients with both carotid occlusion and major clinical end points. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1998 27, 595-605DOI: (10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70223-X) Copyright © 1998 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Cumulative percentage of patients free of restenosis at 3 years in the eversion (dotted line) and standard (solid line) groups. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1998 27, 595-605DOI: (10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70223-X) Copyright © 1998 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions