Scaricare la presentazione
La presentazione è in caricamento. Aspetta per favore
1
Farmaci per la prevenzione degli eventi scheletrici
Alfredo Berruti Università degli Studi di Brescia Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili Brescia
2
Skeletal-Related Events Are Prevalent in the Absence of Therapy
Placebo arm* 79% 50% 51% 49% 46% Patients with SRE, % Breast cancer1 Prostate cancer2 Multiple myeloma3 NSCLC and OST4 RCC5 NSCLC = Non-small cell lung cancer; OST = Other solid tumors; RCC = Renal cell carcinoma. *Placebo arm from zoledronic acid and pamidronate clinical trials. 1. Kohno N, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23: ; 2. Saad F, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96: ; 3. Berenson JR, et al. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16: ; 4. Rosen LS, et al. Cancer. 2004;100: ; 5. Mulders PF. Presented at: EAU 2007.
3
Patients Experience Multiple Skeletal Complications before Death
4
Inibitori del riassorbimento osseo
Bisfosfonati: apoptosi degli osteoclasti Denosumab: blocco della maturazione degli osteoclasti
5
Targeting Tumor (bone) Tumor cell microenvironment
J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:1665–1675
6
What is the role of bone resorption agents
in the management of cancer patients? Role End point Pallative: prevention of skeletal elated events bone pain control Antineoplastic: survival prevention of bone metastases
7
Le evidenze che hanno portato all’attuale Standard of Care
RCT III vs Placebo Pamidronate1,2 Ibandronate3 Zoledronic acid4,5,6 Breast cancer Multiple myeloma Prostate cancer Lung cancer and other solid tumors 1 Hortobagyi et al. JCO, vol 6, No 6, 1998; 2 Theriault et al. JCO, vol 17, No 3, 1999; 3Body et al. Ann Onc 15: ; 4Rosen et al. Cancer Vol 98, No 8, 2003; 5Rosen, Cancer, In press; 6Saad, JNCI, Convenienza di somministrazione PAM 2h infusione ZOL 15 min infusione
8
Bisphosphonates and SRE in Advanced Breast Cancer
Wong MH, et al Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012
9
Bisphosphonates and SRE and Bone Pain in Advanced Postate Cancer
SREs Bone Pain Yuen KK et al Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006
10
Quando non usare il bisfosfonato
14
A combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials
Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events A combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials Time To First SRE (test non-inferiority and superiority) -17% Lipton A, et al. European Journal of Cancer (2012) 48,
15
Other solid tumours/MM3†
1 Efficacia nella prevenzione del primo evento scheletrico e successivi nella maggioranza di istotipi tumorali La riduzione del rischio di sviluppare il primo evento scheletrico è a favore di denosumab in maniera consistente in tutti i tumor type 18% risk reduction 18% risk reduction 16% risk reduction Breast cancer1 Prostate cancer2 Other solid tumours/MM3† 100 HR = 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71–0.95) P = 0.01 (superiority) HR = 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71–0.95) P = (superiority) HR = 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71–0.98) P = (non-inferiority) P = 0.06 (NS for superiority) 90 80 Not yet reached 20.7 months 70 20.6 months 60 Patients without SRE (%) 50 40 26.4 months 17.1 months 16.3 months 30 Denosumab consistently reduced risk of first SRE across different tumour types: 18% risk reduction over zoledronic acid in patients with breast cancer (P = 0.01, superiority).1 18% risk reduction over zoledronic acid in patients with prostate cancer (P = 0.008, superiority).2 16% risk reduction over zoledronic acid in patients with solid tumours and multiple myeloma (P = 0.06, superiority).3 17% risk reduction over zoledronic acid in the integrated analysis combining data from all three studies (P < , superiority).4 References Stopeck AT, Lipton A, Body J-J, et al. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:5132–9. Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet 2011;377:81322. Henry DH, Costa L, Goldwasser F, et al. Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:112532. Lipton A, Siena S, Rader M et al. Comparison of denosumab versus zoledronic acid (ZA) for treatment of bone metastases in advanced cancer patients: an integrated analysis of 3 pivotal trials [Abstract 1249P]. Ann Oncol 2010;21(Suppl 8):viii379. 20 10 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Denosumab Study month Zoledronic acid 1. Stopeck AT, et al. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:5132-9; 2. Fizazi K, et al. Lancet 2011;377:813-22; 3. Henry DH, et al. J Clin Oncol 2011;29: †Excluding breast and prostate. All data from primary analyses. MM, multiple myeloma; NS, non-significant.
16
Denosumab vs Acido Zoledronico
Maggiore efficacia Maggiori costi
17
Quando preferire Denosumab?
Livelli di creatinina elevati
19
Nuovi scenari Interazioni con i “nuovi” farmaci
20
Drugs targeting AR and SRE prevention
Abiraterone
21
Enzalutamide: Tempo al primo SRE
Il tempo di insorgenza del primo SRE è stato significativamente ritardato da enzalutamide rispetto a placebo: 16.7 versus 13.3 mesi (HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.57–0.84; p<0.001) 31% riduzione del rischio di SRE 100 80 Enzalutamide: 16.7 mesi (95% CI: 14.6–19.1) 60 SRE libero (%) 40 Placebo: 13.3 mesi (95% CI: 5.5–NYR) 20 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Tempo all’evento (mesi) N. a rischio: Enzalutamide, n= Placebo, n= Text missing after delayed 800 399 676 278 548 196 379 128 209 68 87 33 19 11 2 Tempo al primo SRE definito come il tempo di radioterapia, chirurgia ossea, fratture ossee patologiche, compressione del midollo spinale o il cambiamento di terapia antineoplastica per trattare il dolore osseo. CI= intervallo di confidenza; HR= rapporto di rischio; NYR= non ancora raggiunto; SRE= eventi scheletrici correlati. De Bono J, et al. Presented at ASCO 2012; Oral presentation 4519.
22
Clin Cancer Res 17: , 2011
23
Efficacy of bisphosphonates in abiraterone treated patients
Efficacy of bisphosphonates in abiraterone treated patients. Explorative analysis (Overall ITT Population) Endpoint BTT Use No BTT Use HR (95% CI) P Value rPFS 13.60 ( ) 10.97 ( ) 0.855 ( ) 0.079 OS NE (30.88, NE) 30.26 ( ) 0.754 ( ) 0.012 Time to opiate use (27.63, NE) 27.89 ( ) 0.801 ( ) 0.036 Time to chemotherapy 22.41 ( ) 21.06 ( ) 0.916 ( ) 0.348 Time to ECOG deterioration 14.26 ( ) 11.07 ( ) 0.750 ( ) <0.001 TTPP 8.34 ( ) 8.31 ( ) 0.878 ( ) 0.105 Saad C et al. ASCO 2013; Abstract 5037 (Poster Presentation)
24
mTOR INHIBITORS AND OSTEOCLAST ACTIVATION
Bertoldo F et al. Biochimica and Biophysica Acta : 1845: , 2014
29
Supplementazione vitamina D
Everolimus + Denosumab or Zoledronic acid Hypophosphatemia Hypocalcemia Supplementazione vitamina D
Presentazioni simili
© 2024 SlidePlayer.it Inc.
All rights reserved.