La presentazione è in caricamento. Aspetta per favore

La presentazione è in caricamento. Aspetta per favore

Clinica Malattie Infettive e Tropicali 2nd INFECTIVOLOGY TODAY

Presentazioni simili


Presentazione sul tema: "Clinica Malattie Infettive e Tropicali 2nd INFECTIVOLOGY TODAY"— Transcript della presentazione:

1 Clinica Malattie Infettive e Tropicali 2nd INFECTIVOLOGY TODAY
Le infezioni nelle Unità di Terapia Intensiva: è possibile ridurne l’incidenza? Paolo Grossi Clinica Malattie Infettive e Tropicali Università degli Studi dell’Insubria – Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese 2nd INFECTIVOLOGY TODAY "L’infettivologia del III millennio: NON solo AIDS" PAESTUM MAGGIO 2006

2 Studio INF-NOS 2002-04 Multicentrica Prevalenza di IN totale e per area
La slide evidenzia una sostanziale stabilità della prevalenza di IN, con un trend in riduzione nelle aree critiche Studi di prevalenza

3 Prevalenza di pazienti con IN e durata degenza al momento dello studio
Tutto l’ospedale Quadro generale che mostra una sostanziale stabilità della prevalenza generale di IN negli studi seriati, ed una riduzione della degenza degli infetti al momento dello studio (che forse riflette la maggiore complessità dei pazienti e la conseguente maggiore precocità di procedure invasive)

4 Prevalenza di pazienti con IN e durata degenza al momento dello studio
Area critica Nell’area critica si rileva una riduzione della prevalenza di IN

5 Principali patologie infettive in pazienti ricoverati in Terapia Intensiva
VENTILATOR ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA (VAP) BLOODSTREAM INFECTION (BSI) URINARY TRACT INFECTION (UTI) INTRA ABDOMINAL INFECTION (IAI)

6 Incidence rates and distribution of pathogens most commonly isolated from monomicrobial nosocomial BSIs and associated crude mortality rates for all patients, patients in ICU, and patients in non-ICU wards. Hilmar Wisplinghoff, et al. CID 2004; 39:309–17

7

8 Infections in ICU Intensive care units can be considered as ‘factories’ for creating, disseminating and amplifying resistance to antibiotics, for many reasons: importation of resistant microorganisms at admission, selection of resistant strains with an extensive use of broad spectrum antibiotics, cross-transmission of resistant strains via the hands or the environment.

9 Collateral Damage from Cephalosporins & Quinolones
“Collateral damage’ is a term used to refer to ecological adverse effects of antibiotic therapy; namely, the selection of drug-resistant organisms and the unwanted development of colonization or infection with multidrug-resistant organisms.” “…Neither third-generation cephalosporins nor quinolones appear suitable for sustained use in hospitals as “workhorse” antibiotic therapy….” Paterson DL. Clin Infect Dis 2004:38(Suppl 4):S341-S345

10 National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004 Am J Infect Control 2004;32:

11 Perugia, 11 maggio 2006

12 Staphylococcus aureus: invasive isolates resistant to methicillin (MRSA) in 2004
(European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Scheme

13 Enterococcus faecium: proportion of invasive isolates resistant to vancomycin in 2004.
(European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Scheme

14 Enterobatteri produttori di ESBL
_____________________________________________ Pazienti Isolati ESBL No No. (%) Ricoverati (1999) (6,3) Ricoverati (2003) (7,4) Ambulatoriali (2003) (3,5) Luzzaro F. et eal. JCM, May 2006, p. 1659–1664

15 SORVEGLIANZA NAZIONALE 2003 Pazienti ospedalizzati (n=504)
Chirurgia ICU Medicina

16 P. aeruginosa P. putida A. xylosoxydans Acinetobacter spp.
The Italian map of MBL producer has been updated on the basis of this nationwide survey. MBL-producing P. aeruginosa are present over the whole national territory, though the impact of MBL producers remains relatively low. VIM producers are more prevalent than IMP producers. Production of MBL in other GNNFs and Enterobacteriaceae is limited to occasional isolates. CATANIA VIM-1 PALERMO VIM-11 PESCARA IMP-13 VERONA VIM-1 VIM-2 IMP-2 TRIESTE MILANO VARESE IMP-2 IMP-12 IMP-13 PISA VIM-4 SIENA PAVIA VIM-2 S. GIOVANNI ROTONDO GENOVA NAPOLI VIM-1-like AVELLINO VIM-like ROMA IMP-2 IMP-13 SASSARI CREMONA VIM-2-like FOGGIA ATRI L’AQUILA PERUGIA IMP-like TORINO P. aeruginosa P. putida A. xylosoxydans Acinetobacter spp. 45th ICAAC Washington, 2005 16th ECCMID Nice, 2006

17 Resistenza ai carbapenemici in A. baumannii in Italia

18 Model for comprehensive surveillance and prevention of health care-associated adverse events in the United States

19 Temporal Relationship between Prevalence of MRSA in One Hospital and Prevalence of MRSA in the Surrounding Community: A Time Series Analysis Screening at patient discharge should be tested as new measure to control Spread of MRSA in the community I. M. GOULD, et al. ICAAC 2004

20 Proposed schematic to classify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates as nosocomial or community-onset strains among individuals with and individuals without health care–associated risk factors. Salgado et al. CID 2003;36:

21 Evaluating the Probability of MRSA Carriage at Admission to a Large University Hospital with Endemic MRSA Screening was performed by nasal and inguinal swabs within 24 hours of admission, and included other sites when clinically indicated. From January through August 2003, 90% (12,072/13,440) of all admissions were screened. Overall, 399 admissions (prevalence, 3.3%) were found colonized (n=368, 92%) or infected (n=31, 8%) with MRSA. The prevalence of positive admissions was highest in sub-acute (5.7%) and chronic care wards (12.8%). MRSA carriers (n=355) were more likely to have one or several of the following risk factors (all p<.001): older age prior hospitalization antibiotic exposure invasive procedures greater severity of underlying illness D. PITTET, et al. ICAAC 2004

22 The Inanimate Environment Can Facilitate Transmission
X represents VRE culture positive sites In one study, hands of 131 healthcare workers (HCWs) were cultured before, and hands and gloves after, routine care. A mean of 56% of body sites and 17% of environmental sites were VRE positive. After touching the patient and environment, 75% of ungloved HCWs hands and 9% of gloved HCWs hands were contaminated with VRE. After touching only the environment, 21% of ungloved and 0 gloved HCWs hands were contaminated. The inanimate environment plays a role in facilitating transmission of organisms. ~ Contaminated surfaces increase cross-transmission ~ Abstract: The Risk of Hand and Glove Contamination after Contact with a VRE (+) Patient Environment. Hayden M, ICAAC, 2001, Chicago, IL.

23 The spectrum of contaminant bacterial flora of patient’s files in ICU and surgical wards.
Panhotra Bodh R., et al, Am J Infect Control 2005;33:

24 Origin of Nosocomial Infection Microorganisms: Water
Splash from sink drain, toilet flushing Faucet aerator, faucet, water lines Water from vase in surgical ward Aeromonas, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium, Flavimonas, Legionella, Mycobacteria Trautmann, 2005

25

26 Factors influencing adherence to hand-hygiene practices
Observed risk factors for poor adherence to recommended hand-hygiene practices Physician status (rather than a nurse) Nursing assistant status (rather than a nurse) Male sex Working in an intensive-care unit Working during the week (versus the weekend) Wearing gowns/gloves Automated sink Activities with high risk of cross-transmission High number of opportunities for hand hygiene per hour of patient care Adapted from Pittet D. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:381–6.

27 Can we do something else ?

28

29

30 Relationship between workload (modified TIS) and the number of trained nurses on day duty per week.
Dancer et al. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:10-7.

31 Total workload, MRSA acquisition weeks, number of nurses on day duty, and hygiene assessment over a 5-month period on the ICU Dancer et al. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:10-7.

32 Relationship between workload (modified TIS) and the number of trained nurses on day duty per week.
Dancer et al. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:10-7.

33 Ospedale di Varese: procedure messe in atto per il controllo delle infezioni nosocomiali
2001 Revisione dei protocolli terapeutici 2002 Adozione della richiesta motivata per l’utilizzo di alcuni antibiotici ad ampio spettro (associata ad attività di formazione) 2003 Elaborazione e diffusione di direttive interne all'ospedale per le indicazioni più importanti (gestione di CVC e dispositivi medico- chirurgici, emocolture) 2004 Revisione dei protocolli per la profilassi delle infezioni delle ferite chirurgiche 2005 Adozione di un nuovo protocollo per la disinfezione delle mani 2006 Informatizzazione della richiesta motivata di antibiotici

34 ICU Varese: percentuali di resistenza ai farmaci
Staphylococcus aureus ( ) 78,4 52,5

35 ICU Varese: percentuali di resistenza ai farmaci
Enterococcus faecium ( ) 40 25 8

36 ICU Varese: percentuali di resistenza ai farmaci
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( ) 38,5 33,7 24,7 21,8

37 ICU Varese: percentuali di resistenza ai farmaci
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( ) 50,2 43,1 24,1 6,7

38 ICU Varese: percentuali di resistenza ai farmaci
Enterobacteriaceae ( ) 24,6 20,4 14,8

39 Isolati di K. pneumoniae produttore di ESBL
in Terapia intensiva ( ) N. di isolati 25 38 1/20 2/19 3/15 1/17

40 Isolati di E. coli produttore di ESBL in Terapia intensiva (2001-2005)
N. di isolati 1/34 1/52 2/51 5/43 Perugia, 11 maggio 2006

41 Il controllo delle resistenze batteriche si basa su attività di: sorveglianza, controllo e formazione Sorveglianza da laboratorio Microrganismi sentinella (P. aeruginosa MDR, A. baumannii MDR, MRSA, Enterobatteri produttori di ESBL, Enterococchi VRE) Controllo delle resistenze Epidemiologia delle resistenze Profilassi antibiotica in chirurgia: protocolli e verifica applicativa Prescrizione motivata di molecole antibiotiche di classi selezionate Linee guida in patologie selezionate e nei trattamenti empirici Gestione dei CVC e dei dispositivi medico-chirurgici Protocollo lavaggio mani Misure di isolamento (VRE, C. difficile) Controllo del consumo da farmacia Formazione Migliorare la prescrizione di antibiotici con misure educative Elaborare e diffondere le direttive interne all'ospedale per le indicazioni più importanti

42 Infectious Diseases Expert Resources
Specialists Optimal Patient Care Infection Control Professionals Healthcare Epidemiologists Clinical Pharmacists Clinical Pharmacologists Surgical Infection Experts Microbiologists Infectious diseases specialists are one important resource for providing input, but many other professionals also contribute to optimal care for patients with infections. Like all patient safety endeavors, multidisciplinary collaboration is key!


Scaricare ppt "Clinica Malattie Infettive e Tropicali 2nd INFECTIVOLOGY TODAY"

Presentazioni simili


Annunci Google