Lingua inglese 3 2014-2015 prof. Chiara Degano Lesson 1.

Presentazione sul tema: "Lingua inglese 3 2014-2015 prof. Chiara Degano Lesson 1."— Transcript della presentazione:

1 Lingua inglese 3 2014-2015 prof. Chiara Degano Lesson 1

2 Organizzazione Corso: – Mart. 9/11 T12B – Ven 9/11 T12A Ricevimento Degano – martedì 11-12 – Venerdì11-12 Lettorati – A. Smith: DA DEFINIRE – A. Caslinggiov.12/14 P25; ven 13/15 P10 – Traduzione (A. Casling) ven. 11/13 P10 – Writing M-Z (C.Eade)ven. 16/18 T28

3 Esame e valutazione Use of English /30 Writing /20 Speaking /20 Modulo /30

4 TERZO ANNO - Speaking B2 – 15 mins per student; 30 mins per pair Oral presentation based on a newspaper/magazine article (preferably editorials/comments), about 400-500 words long, published no earlier than a month before the exam. Student A presents an article, highlighting the standpoint and the supporting arguments. S/he will then take position with regard to the views expressed in the article and give reason for that (10 Minutes) Student B comments on the views presented by A and/or asks questions. ( 5 mins) Student B presents an article, highlighting the standpoint and the supporting arguments. S/he will then take position with regard to the views expressed in the article and give reason for that (10 Minutes) Student A comments on the views presented by B and/or asks questions. – (5 mins) The examiner can take part in the interaction as a moderator, as well as ask questions about the content (including pictures and headlines) and the language used in the article.

5 Modulo Il corso offre un’introduzione sia teorica sia pratica alla traduzione di testi specialistici appartenenti a generi diversi, in ambiti quali il discorso economico-commerciale (ivi compreso il turismo), scientifico e dei media. In particolare, verranno affrontati alcuni problemi traduttologici fondamentali, prendendo in analisi livelli linguistici diversi quali quello terminologico, lessico-grammaticale, sintattico e discorsivo. Particolare attenzione verrà riservata all’uso di risorse online a supporto della traduzione quali glossari e corpora.

6 Valutazione modulo (esame finale) Parziale (esonero) – Prova di traduzione inglese-italiano e italiano-inglese – Quesiti su equivalenze lessicali /grammaticali (collocations/colligations) Orale – Lettura ad alta voce (inglese) – Traduzione a vista inglese-italiano – Quesiti di controllo delle strutture morfo-sintattiche della lingua inglese – Domande su teoria della traduzione/strategie della traduzione

7 Bibliografia Laviosa, Sara 2008. “Linking Wor(l)ds”. Lexis and Grammar for Translation Studies. Napoli: Liguori Editore. Laviosa, Sara 2012. “Corpus linguistics in translation studies”. In Carmen Millan-Varela and Francesca Bartrina (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies. London and New York:Routledge. 239-251. Garzone, Giuliana 2002. Observations on the definition of translation. In University Translation Studies (3rd edition), Fedorov Readings III. Proceedings of the 3rd annual International Conference on Translation Studies, St. Petersburg 26-28 October 2001. pp. 140-159.

8 For centuries, theoretical reflection on translation has focussed on the problem of equivalence of the Target Text (TT) with the Source Text (ST). A number of bi-polar oppositions have been formulated: – Literal-free – Faithful-unfaithful – Overt – covert (House 1981) – Formal correspondence vs dynamic equivalence (Nida-Taber 1969) – Semantic vs communicative translation (Newmark 1981) – Actualization vs historicisation / domestication vs foreignization (Venuti 1995) Opposition not resolved but overcome, as theoretical reflection has moved up to a higher level of speculation, addressing the complexity of language in use as a stratified semiotic system

9 When dominated by the concern for equivalence, the dabate on translation focussed on lexico-grammatical problems (parallel to the development of linguistics) Starting from Saussure, the scope of linguistics expanded to encompass higher levels of signification and communication, leading to a stratified conception of language

10 Language as a multi-level semiotic process Semantic Pragmatic/communicative Cultural Esthetic Lexico-grammatical encoding/decoding The basic level of linguistic (lexico-grammatical) encoding/decoding is dominated by the higher levels

11 The meaning of a sentence is only partly expressed explicitly (i.e. linguistically codified), therefore retrievable in the text The implici part is reconstructed through inference, relying on data relevant to each communicative act, and on conceptual data.

12 Early ’80s: turning point Shift of perspective: from prescriptive to descriptive approach. The relation between the TT and the ST looses centrality (dethronement of the ST) common to functionalist and descriptive approaches

13 Functionalist approach Mainly concerned with non-literary texts Translation choices depend on the purpose the TT is meant to have in the target language community equivalence is supplanted by adequacy: the TT should function adequately in the target culture Hans Vermeer /Katarina Reiss (1984)

14 Descriptive translation studies Equivalence is no more conceived in absolute terms: it varies across time and space. In the target culture the translated text becomes part of its polysystem and functions in relation to the structure of the receiving culture E.g. the Holy Bible has played an important role in Western cultures irrespectively of their degrre of (in)accuracy in rendering the ST. Toury (1991)

15 Another example: Alexander Pope’s vs William Cowper’s translation of the Iliad Pope’s version purged of elements alien to the sensitivity of XVIII century England (crude reference to wounds, dismemberment…) Cowper’s version is less popular, and ‘fuctions’ less in the TC (less pleasant to read) but more accurate in rendering Homer’s world and values.

16 In both functionalist and descriptive approaches, contextual and cultural considerations prevail over linguistic/contrastive concerns. Linguistic facts receive hardly any attention However, they have had the merit of shifting attention from the lower levels of semiosis (lexico-grammatical encoding) to higher levels, which govern the whole process.

17 As a consequence of this shift of perspective, more than one translation project might be legitimate, depending on the use it will be put to. E.g. insurance contract: If used for the stipulation of contracts in foreign countries: “legal” equivalence (target-language oriented approach); If used as court evidence, coming as a parallel text: source-language oriented approach.

18 In LSP translators are required to produce TL texts that read naturally, i.e. that sound like TL originals.